There are few priorities more important to me than making
it easier to afford living in our wonderful community.
The cost of housing in our district is out of control,
and it’s troubling that, in addition to increasing
the tax burden of our residents, the incumbent has proposed
7 ways to raise rents.
In order to protect the diversity that gives Berkeley
its character, we’ve got to make sure that our neighbors
can find affordable places to live—and that they
aren’t priced out of our neighborhoods.
Yet during his term, the incumbent has refused to vote
in favor of allocating one dime from the city’s
general fund to the affordable housing trust fund.
One of my proudest moments in the last 3.5 years was
my vote to appropriate funding to create more affordable
housing. And my record is clear: if elected, I would support
affordable housing without allowing inappropriate development.
The incumbent’s 7 proposals to raise rents in Berkeley
would have made it even more difficult to afford living
in our neighborhoods. I, on the other hand, have fought
to give our city’s residents financial security
and stability.
One of the most controversial issues recently has been
how we regulate the conversion of apartments to condominiums.
It’s a tricky issue that has forced city leaders
to be careful and balanced in our approach. I helped craft
our city’s ordinance that allows 100 conversions
per year—and I believe we worked out a compromise
that balances all of our city’s competing interests.
But some aren’t satisfied, instead, placing Measure
I on the November ballot—a measure that would open
the floodgates for conversion, allowing 500 conversions
per year. Simple economics tells us that, if passed, this
would create mass-scale evictions that would severely
tighten the supply of rental housing, causing rents to
skyrocket. Proponents have argued that it would make buying
a home more affordable—but according to official
city analysis, very few of these new condos would be affordable
to the majority of Berkeley residents.
This misguided initiative would introduce potentially
thousands of new condos on the backs of evicted tenants,
and most of them would still be unaffordable to all but
the wealthy few. Despite the reality that this initiative
is an illusion, the incumbent has refused to oppose it.
I believe in the American Dream of owning your own home,
and I strongly believe our city should do more to help
those who want to buy. But we must make it a genuine effort.
If elected, I would push for the creation of program that
provides real assistance for first-time homebuyers.
PUBLIC SAFETY | AFFORDABLE
HOUSING | TRAFFIC | TAXES
| HEALTH CARE |
GOVERNMENTAL REFORM | UNIVERSITY-CITY
RELATIONS