We need open, transparent government that works for its
people and is responsive to the issues of the community.
The incumbent opposed allowing the voters to decide for
themselves whether or not they want to get money out of
the political process—in June, he voted against
clean money.
I believe we’ve got to get money out of politics.
We need clean money and we need it now.
During his term, my opponent has also led the fight against
instant run-off voting, proposing instead a plan that
would require voters to rank all candidates in a race
in order for their votes to even count—which means
I’d have to rank George W. Bush as one of my choices
for President or my vote will be thrown out. He opposed
the plan for instant run-off voting, which was approved
by 72% of Berkeley voters, that would allow voters to
choose which candidates to vote for and which ones to
omit.
And in 2005, the incumbent voted for the secret, backroom
settlement deal with UC administrators—a deal that
kept us all in the dark about how our community is developed.
We won’t stand for a representative that shuts
us out of the process, making deals when nobody’s
looking. Since I was elected, I’ve fought to increase
transparency.
I’ll be the kind of councilmember who will let
you in and ask what you think. Whether we agree or not,
you’ll always know where I stand. As soon as you
elect me, I’ll start holding monthly town hall meetings—so
I always know how you feel; and I’ll put out a monthly
newsletter—so you always know what I’m working
on.
I support electoral reforms like clean money and instant
run-off voting; unlike my opponent, I won’t vote
against them just because they make me vulnerable.
PUBLIC SAFETY | AFFORDABLE
HOUSING | TRAFFIC | TAXES
| HEALTH CARE |
GOVERNMENTAL REFORM | UNIVERSITY-CITY
RELATIONS